This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It has been a while since Henry Chesbrough coined the term OpenInnovation and formulated it’s definition: “combining internal and external ideas as well as internal and external paths to market to advance the development of new technologies.” OpenInnovation as a paradigm on itself is on its quest to touch base.
The entrepreneur is an innovator and disturbs the economy (De Jong & Marsili, 2010; Schumpeter, 1934). Whereas causation is more oriented at a managerial, Kirznerian, perspective on entrepreneurship, effectuation is oriented at a more experimenting, Schumpeterian, perspective on entrepreneurship (De Jong & Marsili, 2010).
Platform and designthinking, prototyping, ideation, project selection, and speed are imperative capabilities. It’s essential here to sharpen the future possibilities with external knowledge-sharing, openinnovation, and co-creation. 1] Based on Jaruzelski and Dehoff (2010). [2] processes) and externally (e.g.
Platform and designthinking, prototyping, ideation, project selection, and speed are imperative capabilities. It’s essential here to sharpen the future possibilities with external knowledge-sharing, openinnovation, and co-creation. 1] Based on Jaruzelski and Dehoff (2010). [2] processes) and externally (e.g.
Platform and designthinking, prototyping, ideation, project selection, and speed are imperative capabilities. It’s essential here to sharpen the future possibilities with external knowledge sharing, openinnovation, and co-creation. 1 Based on Jaruzelski & Dehoff (2010).
Platform and designthinking, prototyping, ideation, project selection, and speed are imperative capabilities. It’s essential here to sharpen the future possibilities with external knowledge sharing, openinnovation, and co-creation. 1 Based on Jaruzelski & Dehoff (2010).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 29,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content