2012 Open Innovation Technical Review 
Qmarkets
MARCH 16, 2018
As increased consumer awareness transforms markets and government policy, and as technology creates so many unexpected shortcuts, I believe that this trend will only continue in the future. Rising competition from Apple and Google caught Nokia out of position and led to near-bankruptcy in 2012.
IdeaScale
JANUARY 31, 2017
They could be a new way to call a cab, drive a car with little need for gas, or a completely new way to look at medical science, technology, or entertainment. However, these innovations aren’t that common. The most successful, innovative companies strike a balance between core, adjacent, and transformational initiatives.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Harvard Business Review
MAY 31, 2011
The Harvard Business Review 's mission is to improve the practice of management and its impact on a changing world. Led by Gary Hamel and supported by McKinsey & Company (along with a handful of like-minded organizations), the MIX is a web-based open innovation project aimed at reinventing management for the 21st century.
Harvard Business Review
AUGUST 6, 2012
In an era of intense globalization, rapid demographic change and accelerating technological progress, the best companies for leadership recognize the value of innovation, putting it at the heart of their corporate culture and using this targeted, focused innovation to drive shareholder value and improve efficiency.
Harvard Business Review
OCTOBER 31, 2012
HP is #10 on the 2012 list, and IBM is number 19. HP holding onto its PC division because it will help them manage supplier negotiations suggests that they are trying to preserve a cost position, rather than innovate on value. IBM and HP are two amazing companies with long and meaningful histories.
Harvard Business Review
APRIL 23, 2018
Since the Apollo program, NASA has faced funding cuts, competition from other nations for space leadership, and a radical restructuring of its operating environment due to the emergence of commercial space – all of which have forced the organization to change its ways of thinking and operating. This model made sense for a few reasons.
Open Innovation EU
SEPTEMBER 6, 2018
New generations, societal change, sustainable goals and disruptive technology require organizations to be much more flexible, self-reinventing organisms that don’t fit above-mentioned design principles. They require openness, transparency, adaptability, co-creation, self-management and responsiveness. References. Jelinek, M.,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
69 
Let's personalize your content