Paul Hobcraft

DECEMBER 22, 2021

I would start by saying innovation should always be in “creative tension”, and as we operate and manage innovation, this tension should also apply within any design. The ability to manage innovation design, function, structure and process. Innovation needs to have a system that is constantly adaptive and flexible.

Design 130

Design Creativity Agile Resources 130

Tim Kastelle

MARCH 7, 2016

Reinvention through business model innovation. Accelerating dynamics and pace of disruption in most industries, in particular triggered by the perfusion of new technologies, lead to decreasing life times of existing business models. Platform business models tend to affect, oftentimes disrupt, multiple industries over time.

Innovation Management 100

Innovation Management Management LEAN Technical Review 100

Paul Hobcraft

OCTOBER 3, 2016

We need to transform, be disrupted or certainly re-imagine and this is where knowing your ecosystem comes in. Our existing organization needs to envisage a changing world full of disruption that calls for radical change. Welcome to the transforming world of Innovation Ecosystems.

Collaboration 273

Collaboration Technical Review Disruption Innovation 273

Paul Hobcraft

OCTOBER 3, 2016

We need to transform, be disrupted or certainly re-imagine and this is where knowing your ecosystem comes in. Our existing organization needs to envisage a changing world full of disruption that calls for radical change. Welcome to the transforming world of Innovation Ecosystems.

Collaboration 273

Collaboration Disruption Innovation Technical Review 273

Tim Kastelle

APRIL 30, 2016

Similarly, about 70 percent of disruptive innovators also lean toward a more centralized approach. Two-thirds of all breakthrough innovators stated that all innovation and product development is controlled and driven by a centralized organization, at least in its initial stages. Accenture: 2015 US Innovation Survey.

Innovation 100

Innovation Disruption Survey Study 100

Paul Hobcraft

SEPTEMBER 2, 2018

There also continues today that industry disruption is increasing, by those spotting both opportunity and weakness in present market players. There is a strategic resistance, there is a lack of organizational agility and still not the level of commitment this is required, driven from the top. The internal change is slow.

Industry 213

Industry Technical Review Design Innovation 213

Integrative Innovation

APRIL 4, 2017

Modern Dual Corporate Innovation Management approaches encompass two complementary directions of impact : Transforming the Core (by largely changing or even disrupting the existing operating model). Creating the New (by largely changing or even disrupting the existing business model).

Disruption 53

Disruption Agile Innovation Innovation Management 53

mjvinnovation

NOVEMBER 12, 2020

Incremental innovation: additional development and/or optimization of existing products, services, or models. Radical innovation: implementing completely new ideas into products, services, or business models. They have the most significant impact because new markets or customer needs may arise from this innovation; ?

Company 40

Company Innovation Radical Innovation Disruption 40

Idea to Value

JULY 21, 2017

Suggested viewing: 12 – Disruptive Innovation. What it is: One of the most important theories of innovation, but one which is usually completely misunderstood. This might seem like a strange thing to say, but the most important thing to realise about Disruptive Innovation is that most people completely misinterpret it.

Company 251

Company Underperforming Technical Team Brainstorming Design Thinking 251

Paul Hobcraft

JULY 18, 2016

Large organisations sense they are missing out on radically different business opportunities and cast their envious eyes towards the young start-ups, not just coming up with original ideas to solve existing problems and pent-up needs, but seeing the work as potentially disruptive to those managing in the existing space.

Agile 100

Agile Disruption Culture Change 100

Paul Hobcraft

JULY 18, 2016

Large organisations sense they are missing out on radically different business opportunities and cast their envious eyes towards the young start-ups, not just coming up with original ideas to solve existing problems and pent-up needs, but seeing the work as potentially disruptive to those managing in the existing space.

Agile 100

Agile Disruption Culture Change 100

Integrative Innovation

MARCH 16, 2014

The corresponding integration of incremental and radical innovation can basically be achieved in different ways: Building ambidextrous and lean startup capabilities. Established organizations with larger size usually target at extending their core business by incementally innovating their existing business model.

Radical Innovation 83

Radical Innovation LEAN Underperforming Technical Team Disruption 83

Paul Hobcraft

MAY 18, 2016

They are quiet rightly suggesting “ with risks well-managed, companies can then use rapid experimentation and the techniques of agile development—an iterative process closely linked to customers and markets—to boost their chances of coming up with a truly profitable innovation portfolio”. Risk needs to be proactive not reactive.

Innovation 133

Innovation Guidelines Learning Management 133

Paul Hobcraft

MAY 18, 2016

They are quiet rightly suggesting “ with risks well-managed, companies can then use rapid experimentation and the techniques of agile development—an iterative process closely linked to customers and markets—to boost their chances of coming up with a truly profitable innovation portfolio”. Risk needs to be proactive not reactive.

Innovation 133

Innovation Guidelines Learning Management 133

Integrative Innovation

SEPTEMBER 6, 2018

Company builders that operate decentralized isolated to explore and develop disruptive innovations that are beyond the core business have been a rarity so far. The Digital Innovation Units will be more focused on their original purposes and more cooperation with each other. Recommendations for action: Company Builders.

Trends 58

Trends Technical Review Innovation Disruption 58

Integrative Innovation

APRIL 7, 2016

Similarly, about 70 percent of disruptive innovators also lean toward a more centralized approach. Two-thirds of all breakthrough innovators stated that all innovation and product development is controlled and driven by a centralized organization, at least in its initial stages. Accenture: 2015 US Innovation Survey.

Disruption 40

Disruption Innovation Survey Study 40

Paul Hobcraft

NOVEMBER 6, 2017

The innovation architecture is progressively being recognized and put into place, it’s forming the building blocks of the innovation platform we need to build upon, ones for more radical innovation outcomes. So the article “ Want to Win at Business Model Innovation?

Innovation 157

Innovation Leadership Strategy Strategy 157

hackerearth

NOVEMBER 10, 2017

It is the failure to innovate that led to its “demise.”. In other words, it is because sometimes innovation strategies fail to produce products/ services that the customers want. And as the saying goes, “disrupt or get disrupted.”. Which brings us to the question, “Why do innovation programs fail?”.

Innovation Programs 40

Innovation Programs Underperforming Technical Team Innovation Ideation 40

Qmarkets

APRIL 24, 2017

As a result, we moved from initially offering solutions limited to the back-end of innovation (project portfolio management and Stage-Gate™ project governance), to the front-end of innovation, where collaborative and open innovation offered very efficient ways to feed the innovation pipeline with more innovative ideas and concepts.

Innovation Programs 56

Innovation Programs Software Review Technical Review Innovation 56

Integrative Innovation

NOVEMBER 17, 2017

tapping into novel, occasionally disruptive, technologies or business models – most of which are not created inside the company walls. outsourcing’ uncertainty, particularly in early phases of radical/disruptive innovation activities. Benefits for corporations include. early pick’ option in case of startup takeoff.

Technical Review 61

Technical Review Collaboration Disruption Engagement 61

Paul Hobcraft

SEPTEMBER 18, 2015

Yes we constantly attempt to squeeze all our innovation activity into a well-designed process but so much of those more radical innovations just cannot fit and we are then forced to ‘kill them off’ as the system rejects them.

Underperforming Technical Team 100

Underperforming Technical Team Change System Culture 100

Paul Hobcraft

DECEMBER 16, 2015

Somehow we need to respond in more agile, fluid and adaptive ways. Many try to separate them, often hiving off the more radical innovation development part to protect it from being overwhelmed by the often overbearing focus on the short-term and exploitation.

Innovation 100

Innovation Resources Design Management 100

Innovation 360 Group

JUNE 19, 2018

Over the years as we helped innovators be more successful and read scientific studies on factors related to disruptive change, we came to believe that the desire to radically innovate and the openness to change had a positive impact on the results organizations saw from their creative projects. Let’s go to work.

Underperforming Technical Team 40

Underperforming Technical Team Radical Innovation Technical Review Software Review 40

Innovation 360

JUNE 20, 2018

Over the years as we helped innovators be more successful and read scientific studies on factors related to disruptive change, we came to believe that the desire to radically innovate and the openness to change had a positive impact on the results organizations saw from their creative projects. Let’s go to work.

Underperforming Technical Team 40

Underperforming Technical Team Radical Innovation Technical Review Software Review 40

Paul Hobcraft

MAY 5, 2016

Why do established businesses ignore the investment rationale for delivering real innovation winners that can change the fortune of the business and leave this ‘venturing’ to others to gain transformational solutions or even radically alter existing business value propositions and then ‘cry’ over being disrupted?

Innovation 100

Innovation Engagement Technical Review Entrepreneurship 100

Qmarkets

JULY 8, 2017

As a result, we moved from initially offering solutions limited to the back-end of innovation (project portfolio management and Stage-Gate™ project governance), to the front-end of innovation, where collaborative and open innovation offered very efficient ways to feed the innovation pipeline with more innovative ideas and concepts.

Innovation Programs 40

Innovation Programs Software Review Technical Review Innovation 40

Integrative Innovation

SEPTEMBER 11, 2018

The solution to this question lies in the middle part of an end-to-end process for non-incremental innovation. We call this part ‘ Scaling-Up ‘ Typically, companies have little problems in generating ideas for adjacent, radical or even disruptive innovation and in validating the most promising ideas.

Innovation Management 40

Innovation Management Disruption Design Management 40

Integrative Innovation

JANUARY 27, 2016

Reinvention through business model innovation. Accelerating dynamics and pace of disruption in most industries, in particular triggered by the pervasion of new technologies, lead to decreasing life times of existing business models. We can see that experimentation comes in different flavors, depending on the innovation context.

Underperforming Technical Team 40

Underperforming Technical Team Big Data Innovation Technical Review 40

Integrative Innovation

OCTOBER 18, 2016

Recently, Match-Maker Ventures and Arthur D. Little have released an interesting report, titled “ The Age of Collaboration “ The study does a good job in synthesizing the global state of play of corporate-startup collaboration and latest findings on success requirements for its implementation.

Engagement 40

Engagement Collaboration Report LEAN 40

Innovation 360 Group

JANUARY 14, 2016

Moreover, technological innovation will also lead to more reuse and less waste of material and energy due to economical reasons and social demands. At the same time, as the economists Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee have pointed out, the revolution could yield greater inequality, particularly in its potential to disrupt labor markets.

Analysis 40

Analysis Industry Artificial Inteligence Technical Review 40

Innovation 360

JANUARY 24, 2016

Moreover, technological innovation will also lead to more reuse and less waste of material and energy due to economical reasons and social demands. At the same time, as the economists Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee have pointed out, the revolution could yield greater inequality, particularly in its potential to disrupt labor markets.

Industry 40

Industry Analysis Artificial Inteligence Technical Review 40