This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
What is Gap Analysis? Gap Analysis: A Practical Guide for Strategy Projects Gap Analysis is a structured framework used to evaluate the difference between an organizations current performance and its desired future state. Key questions to consider: What performance area, process, or goal is being assessed?
When speaking with founders and CEOs, we often hear concerns like this: My project manager is losing confidence in the developmentteam. The PMs are seeing late deliveries and bugs that suggest the devs just aren’t capable enough. This can be true even if those failures had nothing to do with the current team.
Many CEOs of software-enabled businesses call us with a similar concern: Are we getting the right results from our softwareteam? We hear them explain that their current softwaredevelopment is expensive, deliveries are rarely on time, and random bugs appear. But everyone’s situation is unique.
Nothing frustrates softwaredevelopers more than working hard on something that never ends up providing value. Whether because of changing priorities, miscommunication among teams, or other blockers, the hidden cost of waste can significantly impact productivity and bottom lines.
Introduction User interface (UI) patterns have the potential to make softwaredevelopment more efficient. The problem To date, the most common approach to propagating a single user experience standard is the development of UI guidelines and principles documentation within an organization.
With all the open-source code and available context across the internet, AI models can generate software code and help softwaredevelopers debug their work. For example, imagine a team of engineers needs to do a manual review of their performance at the end of every sprint.
It is a set of practices that automates the process between softwaredevelopment and IT teams. The process involves building, testing and releasing the software faster and more reliably. And this helps identify issues with the code change by reporting the test cases execution analysis.
Information compounds on our desktops, the team with analysis paralysis most often loses to the nimble risk takers—but all this means is that in product development , the role of Quality Assurance (QA) has never been more critical. ” Believe me, I understand trade-offs.
As part of this effort, the company decided to use tools to drive high levels of performance on a new project that required both hardware and software components. The hardware team had employed similar processes in the past and found them helpful. So the company assumed the softwareteam would, too.
This design pathology repeats itself virtually every day around the world by otherwise diligent and sincere innovators. Requirements" are the wrong unit of analysis for crafting innovative design. They've proven remarkably successful for softwaredevelopers and customer-centric industrial designers alike.
See More Videos > See More Videos > The downside of this approach is that when projects increase in complexity and team size, the central individual can become a communication and coordination bottleneck for the team. Another approach is to let teams self-manage. But is this really the best way to work?
Many softwaredevelopmentteams hold mini-debriefs every morning to review yesterday’s progress and today’s goals—and longer debriefs every month or two to understand larger project wins and challenges. Review four key questions. Review your results, and ensure the group is aligned.
Consider the battle waged by IBM’s softwaredevelopmentteams between competing methods for getting closer to customers. The issue arose as a result of changes to IBM’s business model for software. In the past, IBM mostly provided enterprise software to customers who installed it on their own computers.
” Makers, also known as individual contributors, are the softwaredevelopers, engineers, architects, writers, and researchers who produce knowledge. This is particularly true in organizations where employees are both, what Paul Graham calls, “makers” and “managers.”
Managers under pressure to make many decisions can''t subject every one of them to thorough and dispassionate analysis. Drawing on the softwaredevelopment practices known as Agile, Scrum, and XP, the teams work in short, iterative cycles of test-driven development with direct customer feedback as the work proceeds.).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 29,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content