This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Others are being disrupted. Reviews, social media, mobile devices and so on mean that the quantity of information customers have on products, services, support issues, and ethical behavior makes them agile than the companies who serve them. And it’s a good thing, since their current business model is facing massive disruption.
This article first appeared on the Harvard Business Review blog. In his Harvard Business Review article summing up his tenure, Immelt recalls that the two things that influenced him most were Marc Andreessen’s 2011 Wall Street Journal article “ Why Software Is Eating the World, ” and Eric Ries’s book The Lean Startup.
Between 1996-2001, Jim Collins’ team researched and wrote a bestselling book called Good to Great. Innovations of the 21st Century era do not rely on one to discover secret codes of the universe. To begin cracking that code, one must understand that innovations of this era are unlike anything we have ever seen before.
Between 1996-2001, Jim Collins’ team researched and wrote a bestselling book called Good to Great. Innovations of the 21st Century era do not rely on one to discover secret codes of the universe. To begin cracking that code, one must understand that innovations of this era are unlike anything we have ever seen before.
Between 1996-2001, Jim Collins’ team researched and wrote a bestselling book called Good to Great. Innovations of the 21st Century era do not rely on one to discover secret codes of the universe. To begin cracking that code, one must understand that innovations of this era are unlike anything we have ever seen before.
To understand Samsung’s rise to dominance we have to go back to the turn of the new millennium when Apple released their first generation iPod in 2001, quickly followed by the iTunes store in 2002. Click & Connect with Matthew: LinkedIn . mgriffin_uk . +44 44 (0) 7957 456194. Click & Connect with Matthew: LinkedIn .
In this post I review important lessons learned by CVCs that have been operating for many years and several economic cycles and best practices being used by newer CVCs. They invest in different sectors: such as software and services for USAA Ventures, and materials (and more) for BASF Venture Capital. and Europe. They invest globally.
In this post I review important lessons learned by CVCs that have been operating for many years and several economic cycles and best practices being used by newer CVCs. They invest in different sectors: such as software and services for USAA Ventures, and materials (and more) for BASF Venture Capital. and Europe. They invest globally.
In this post I review important lessons learned by CVCs that have been operating for many years and several economic cycles and best practices being used by newer CVCs. They invest in different sectors: such as software and services for USAA Ventures, and materials (and more) for BASF Venture Capital. and Europe. They invest globally.
Microsoft entered the 21st century as the dominant software provider for anyone who interacted with a computing device. 16 years later it’s just another software company. Between 2001 to 2008, Jobs reinvented the company three times. Most often innovation dies and the company coasts for years on momentum and its brand.
A Fundamental Disruption: Moving Information Architecture into the Hands of Individual Consumers – Peter Sweeney & Robert Barlow-Busch A fundamental assumption in information architecture is that producers need to organize their content before consumers can access it effectively. We love the work we do.
Amid the rubble of the dot-com bust in 2001, Michael Porter weighed in on the question of how to gauge which businesses “active on the internet,” as he put it, were real and which were destined to go the way of Pets.com when their venture funding dried up. It’s still worth a look now.
Agile has indisputably transformed software development, and many experts believe it is now poised to expand far beyond IT. In 1986, one of us (Takeuchi) and coauthor Ikujiro Nonaka published an article in Harvard Business Review called “The New New Product Development Game.” They keep customers happier.
Yesterday HP announced that it would exit the PC and tablet computer business , focusing on higher-margin "strategic priorities of cloud, solutions and software with an emphasis on enterprise, commercial and government markets." On September 3, 2001, HP announced that they would acquire Compaq. •On Why is that? How do I know?
Today, the term increasingly serves as a corporate bogeyman that warns executives of the need to stand up and respond when disruptive developments encroach on their market. Before Mark Zuckerberg wrote a line of Facebook’s code, Kodak made a prescient purchase, acquiring a photo sharing site called Ofoto in 2001.
Microsoft entered the 20 th century as the dominant software provider for anyone who interacted with a computing device. Ballmer was a world-class executor (a Harvard Business School grad and world-class salesman) of an existing business model trying to manage in a world of increasing change and disruption. The result?
In 2001, a new approach to technology development was created by a daring group of developers. The methodology is Continuous Development, which, like agile, began as a software development methodology. Because softwarecode is released in smaller batches, it is easier to identify the source of any problems.
Someday, Apple's now 11-year-long run of nearly unbroken triumph (I'm dating it to the launch of the iPod in November 2001) is going to end. Christensen even said back in 2007 that the iPhone "was not truly disruptive" and probably wouldn't succeed. That is just the way of the business world. Which is a lot easier said than done.
Steve Jobs’ successors are at least an order of magnitude more credible as disruptive innovators than the heirs of Ford and Sloan. The computer, software, telecoms, music, broadcast, publishing, photography, retail, and consumer electronics industries certainly believe so. Don’t bet against him. I don’t.
With increasing industry disruption, efficiency is fast becoming of secondary importance to innovation and agility. For example, in 2001, IBM set up a permanent transformation organization designed to anticipate and respond to the increasingly unpredictable changes in its markets. It's not just standardizing and streamlining.
In his Harvard Business Review article summing up his tenure, Immelt recalls that the two things that influenced him most were Marc Andreessen’s 2011 Wall Street Journal article “ Why Software Is Eating the World ” and Eric Ries’s book The Lean Startup. He doubled GE’s investment in R&D.
Africa’s growth has been well chronicled in Harvard Business Review. disrupt our competitors’ models? In the race for opportunity and influence in Africa, no competitor looms larger than China, which has increased its total trade with Africa twenty-fold since 2001. commercial engagement in Africa. How the U.S. Can the U.S.
The Disruptability Curve presented in my previous blog , is a modest addition to this collection. The Disruptability Curve has two axes. This could be due to a favorable set of regulations, processes, brand, network and technologies or any combination thereof. The Y axes denotes the barrier of entry to the industry.
The Disruptability Curve presented in my previous blog , is a modest addition to this collection. The Disruptability Curve has two axes. This could be due to a favorable set of regulations, processes, brand, network and technologies or any combination thereof. The Y axes denotes the barrier of entry to the industry.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 29,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content