This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
We live in unprecedented technological advances, and with these advances come disruptions that can significantly impact our lives and businesses. Understanding Technological Disruptions Technological disruptions refer to unexpected shifts in technology that can disrupt industries, businesses, and life as we know it.
GUEST POST from Greg Satell In February 2004, Viacom announced that it would spin off Blockbuster Video into its own independent company, which gave its CEO, John Antioco, the opportunity to begin addressing the disruptive threat emanating from Netflix head on.
Blue Lobster at the South Bristol Coop , 2004. When you get enough of them together, you create a blue lobster organization – one that creates positive disruption. What’s with blue lobsters? Well, a blue lobster is rare, about 1 in 2 million , and very beautiful. The key to innovation has been and always will be People.
New generations, societal change, sustainable goals and disruptive technology require organizations to be much more flexible, self-reinventing organisms that don’t fit above-mentioned design principles. structured ambidexterity; O’Reilly & Tushman, 2008; i.e. contextual ambidexterity; Birkinshaw & Gibson, 2004).
For several reasons, such as disruptive threats, digitalization or blurring industry boundaries, established companies are increasingly forced to create new business opportunities, i.e. to come up with adapted or even entirely new business models. Cannibalizing the existing customer base.
In 2017 it was blocked for a few hours by the OOCL Japan, in 2006 it was blocked by the Okal King Dor for 8 hours, and before that in 2004 the Tropic Brilliance became lodged for 3 whole days. The Ever Given blockage caused a backlog of 400 ships, disrupting $9billion worth of goods, and costing Egypt an estimated $12-14mil per day.
It can be defined as a holistic view of a company's bundle of products and services that are of value to the customer (Osterwalder 2004). According to the degree of innovation, innovations can be divided into evolutionary and disruptive innovations. What Is Disruptive Innovation? Christensen C. M, Raynor, M. McDonald, R.
Blue Lobster at the South Bristol Coop , 2004. When you get enough of them together, you create a blue lobster organization – one that creates positive disruption. What’s with blue lobsters? Well, a blue lobster is rare, about 1 in 2 million , and very beautiful. The key to innovation has been and always will be People.
Disrupt or die thinking doesn’t help The typical approach to defining different levels of innovation tends to polarise things for most employees. With the right-hand side of the scale firmly rooted in the phrase ‘disrupt or die’ means, most people instantly jump to extensive, complex, far-out solutions. Barker Scott, Brenda (2004). “3:
But it’s this mindset which must change in order for companies to maintain a competitive edge and fight disruption. This report from Sandroni & Squintani (2004) summarizes decades-worth of psychological research which confirms our innate predisposition towards overconfidence.
This is the key takeaway from this book published by Harvard Business School Press in 2004. Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation has been called “the most influential business idea of recent years.” Johansson has driven home the point with a lot of success stories to make the narrative quite interesting.
In this post I will explain how the disruptibility curve, described in my previous blog posts, could be used for the same purpose. The disruptibility curve maps a company on two axes: The Natural Monopoly and the Customer responsiveness. If you read my previous posts , you can look away now (or rather skip to the next paragraph).
In this post I will explain how the disruptibility curve, described in my previous blog posts, could be used for the same purpose. The disruptibility curve maps a company on two axes: The Natural Monopoly and the Customer responsiveness. If you read my previous posts , you can look away now (or rather skip to the next paragraph).
Phil Gilbert , the general manager of design for IBM software, says, “The design researcher has been the most disruptive of the design disciplines we’ve brought in—and by far the most transformative.”. The company is also filling its ranks with “design researchers,” ethnographers with MFA degrees.
Driven by advancing technologies, accelerating connectivity, and changing attitudes towards employment, organisations are operating in a dynamic environment – one where fast-growing start-ups are disrupting traditional business models and AI is replacing human labour. The digital revolution. What skills will be needed for the future of work?
Jack Ma (2000), Jeff Bezos (2003), Mark Zuckerberg (2004), Reed Hastings (2007), Brian Chesky (2008), Travis Kalanick (2009), Anthony Tan (2012). The New S Curve: Organizations in various countries that I am working with are all buzzing about disruptive innovation – how to build the new growth cycle? Now, how about these?
Jack Ma (2000), Jeff Bezos (2003), Mark Zuckerberg (2004), Reed Hastings (2007), Brian Chesky (2008), Travis Kalanick (2009), Anthony Tan (2012). The New S Curve: Organizations in various countries that I am working with are all buzzing about disruptive innovation – how to build the new growth cycle? Now, how about these?
Jack Ma (2000), Jeff Bezos (2003), Mark Zuckerberg (2004), Reed Hastings (2007), Brian Chesky (2008), Travis Kalanick (2009), Anthony Tan (2012). The New S Curve: Organizations in various countries that I am working with are all buzzing about disruptive innovation – how to build the new growth cycle? Now, how about these?
In 2017 it was blocked for a few hours by the OOCL Japan, in 2006 it was blocked by the Okal King Dor for 8 hours, and before that in 2004 the Tropic Brilliance became lodged for 3 whole days. The Ever Given blockage caused a backlog of 400 ships, disrupting $9billion worth of goods, and costing Egypt an estimated $12-14mil per day.
Another source on the theme, O’Reilly III and Tushman (2004) , talks about being able working ambidextrously with incremental and radical innovation at the same time. H3 is the explorative style: needs are investigated on a deeper level and new technology used to disrupt.
Another source on the theme, O’Reilly III and Tushman (2004) , talks about being able working ambidextrously with incremental and radical innovation at the same time. H3 is the explorative style: needs are investigated on a deeper level and new technology used to disrupt.
But it’s this mindset which must change in order for companies to maintain a competitive edge and fight disruption. This report from Sandroni & Squintani (2004) summarizes decades-worth of psychological research which confirms our innate predisposition towards overconfidence.
In 2017 it was blocked for a few hours by the OOCL Japan, in 2006 it was blocked by the Okal King Dor for 8 hours, and before that in 2004 the Tropic Brilliance became lodged for 3 whole days. The Ever Given blockage caused a backlog of 400 ships, disrupting $9billion worth of goods, and costing Egypt an estimated $12-14mil per day.
It is only natural to consider whether the cohort of CVCs established during the last five years will have more staying power than the dot-com CVC group, many of which closed down during the economic downturn of 2001-2004. Siemens Venture Capital requires business unit commitment around each investment.
It is only natural to consider whether the cohort of CVCs established during the last five years will have more staying power than the dot-com CVC group, many of which closed down during the economic downturn of 2001-2004. Siemens Venture Capital requires business unit commitment around each investment.
It is only natural to consider whether the cohort of CVCs established during the last five years will have more staying power than the dot-com CVC group, many of which closed down during the economic downturn of 2001-2004. Siemens Venture Capital requires business unit commitment around each investment.
Today’s VUCA world (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous) requires that companies form robust knowledge networks to have any real hope of delivering the innovations, especially transformational innovations, that are needed for the growth which they aspire to or to prevent disruption from new entrants. 3 (2004), 294-302.
Born to immigrant parents in the Australian outback, he would eventually rise to the top of the corporate world, taking over in 2004 as CEO of Dow Chemical. Andrew Liveris likes to defy expectations.
The constant refrain is that Apple has not introduced a disruptive product since Steve Jobs passed away. In 2004, Apple's CFO, Fred Anderson, left the company. So Tim Cook has not introduced any disruptive new products in his first year. Six years without a disruption under Steve Jobs. No iPad mini at all. Apple's is 13.
A new Booz study — actually, a repeat of one it did in 2004 — once again came up with the same result. Nor, Deepwater Horizon notwithstanding, accidents or other operational problems like suppy chain or customer service disruptions. The culprit wasn’t external shocks like the Great Recession.
Not so long ago, Nokia was the disrupter. In 2004, three years before the iPhone, it rejected a proposal to develop a Nokia online applications store. Today, Apple is riding high, making this the perfect time for it — and every successful company — to reflect on Nokia's fall and ensure that they don't suffer the same fate.
After all, he has asserted since 2004 that global oil production was nothing to worry about, and that there would be few effects on the economy. Conventional crude ended its 150-year-long growth trajectory in 2004 and flattened out around 74 million barrels per day. And we must correct some of Mr. Yergin's assertions.
By now everyone knows the story: Kodak went into a free fall that led to bankruptcy in 2012 because it failed to respond to the disruption of digital technology — even though one of its own engineers invented a technology for capturing a digital image in 1975. Finally, you need to make change happen relatively quickly.
I first met Dediu when we did an engagement with Nokia back in 2004. He is one of the most thoughtful students of disruptive innovation you'll meet. There are seven "next-generation" innovation writers and thought leaders that are worth watching (in alphabetical order): 1. Horace Dediu.
HP management conceded that the disruptive impact of the iPad forced their hand but that hand was already quite weak from a decade of over-serving the market. As it turns out, the path of sustaining and the path of disruption diverged that moment in time a decade ago. But they grew, at first slowly, but at all times profitably.
Here's a case in point: In 2004, my HBS colleague Gary Pisano and I conducted a project at a leading manufacturer of highly sophisticated production equipment for the electronics industry, which I'll call "Exotech." This was brought home to me in my field research. Change the Process, Not the People.
Consider the soul-searching that must have gone on at Merck in 2004 when its management finally made the decision to remove Vioxx from the market. It is so dramatic and disruptive that it demands the attention of the entire organization. Why do we do the work we do? Will I have to change my behavior?
The center of gravity for jobs, wealth, and market opportunities is moving, disrupting the world economic order as we have known it. He went on a tear of expansion in Latin America, then in 2004 undertook a merger with Belgium-based Interbrew. The global tilt is an irreversible shift of economic power from North to South: from the U.S.,
That’s nearly double the rate from 2004 to 2007. The industries facing the most disruption have brought in higher-than-average numbers of outsiders recently. Planned successions exclude mergers and acquisitions, as well as situations when CEOs are abruptly forced out.) one of the authors of the study.
This can disrupt a firm’s ability to operate on schedule and budget. Disruptions in the supply chain may affect production processes that depend on unpriced natural capital assets such as biodiversity, groundwater, clean air, and climate. ” Improving risk management. billion in mining projects since 2010.
But the companies we studied resist disruptive reorganizations and instead put their culture to work. That’s how Lego went from losing a million dollars a day in 2004 to being the world’s largest toy company in 2015. The culture of the enterprise, if considered at all, is seen as a hindrance.
I synthesized Innosight's writing, notably Seeing What's Next (my 2004 book with Clayton Christensen) and a 2009 Harvard Business Review article about transformation in clean-tech , with my own field experience to highlight three areas to asses.
I’ve been involved with turnarounds for years, including observing and writing about the Red Sox 2004 World Series win that reversed many decades of being almost-rans. Others need a course correction while still profitable (Microsoft), or a momentum shift because of disruptive new technologies (newspaper companies).
Some of the gap may reflect economists general optimism, but more than that, it signals the recognition that this wave of technological disruption could in fact be different. Against this backdrop, Pews 50-50 split is more troubling.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 29,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content