2004 Disruption Software Development 
hackerearth
DECEMBER 8, 2017
Since then, around 115 professionals from 12 countries, spanning various industries like software development, consulting, manufacturing, and marketing, have taken the online course. The course boasts of an 89 percent completion rate, thus proving its value.
Harvard Business Review
MARCH 28, 2012
Here's a case in point: In 2004, my HBS colleague Gary Pisano and I conducted a project at a leading manufacturer of highly sophisticated production equipment for the electronics industry, which I'll call "Exotech." The project ran successfully for hardware development, and the project management tools worked exactly as expected.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Harvard Business Review
NOVEMBER 20, 2015
Although big, global supply chains certainly have their own dynamism, they mostly evolve incrementally through minnovation rather than disruption – and thus get short shrift in the business media and amongst aspiring entrepreneurs, hungry to create successful ventures.
Harvard Business Review
MAY 4, 2018
The methodology is Continuous Development, which, like agile, began as a software development methodology. Rather than improving software in one large batch, updates are made continuously, piece-by-piece, enabling software code to be delivered to customers as soon as it is completed and tested. .”
Harvard Business Review
AUGUST 9, 2013
By 2004, RIM had acquired 1 million subscribers and only three years later surpassed the 10 million mark. Disruptive innovations begin at the low-margin, high commodity end of the stack and move upward over time, and IT is most likely not going to be an exception. In 1998, RIM launched the BlackBerry. billion in revenues.
Harvard Business Review
SEPTEMBER 12, 2014
These were all true of Charlie, a champion I met in 2004 just as the tech world was beginning to show signs of life after the dot com implosion. At the time, Charlie was an internet security specialist at IBM, and I was running business development at a company called Zone Labs.
Innovation Excellence
JUNE 15, 2020
This involved replacing people with machines to do the same work, but such systems are inflexible and not able to adapt to new challenges unless a person steps in to make changes (Ake et al, 2004; pg 27). Ake et al, 2004; pg 266). Technology has its role in every workplace, but the lights are back on for the people in the room.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
65 
Let's personalize your content